Technology
The software behind every quote.
ARIA is built software-first. The operation is cut into 94 subsystems across 11 systems, each measured against the code and regenerated on every build. We track every one of them, including the ones that do not exist yet.
Subsystem board
11 systems. 94 subsystems. No rounding up.
41 subsystems run with a control that could have failed, 32 exist with an open check, and 11 do not exist yet. A subsystem is the smallest thing with one owner, one failure mode and one piece of evidence that it worked.
states measured against the code, not claimed41 RUNS 32 PARTIAL 6 BUILT 11 NONE 4 MANUAL
The internal board carries each subsystem’s owner, evidence and failure note. This page publishes the counts, not the contents: the evidence describes live solicitation work and stays inside the company.
Control sweep
2,682 controls, run as one chain.
Every module carries its own self-test, and one sweep runs them together so a change in one cannot break another silently.
across 107 modules; 98 publish a counted tally, the rest a verdict line 107 modules
The objective
Unattended 5-axis machining, built from its failure modes.
The direction: 5-axis machining that keeps running with no operator present, on programs verified before they reach the control, with the machine’s data captured on every part it makes. Most of what that takes is not software, and each requirement below is stated as it stands.
Unattended operation is an objective, not a current capability. ARIA Dynamics has not yet demonstrated it.
A program that gouges is unrecoverable when nobody is watching. Ours are generated to a closed-form offset, gated on removed volume, and executed against a stock model before they reach a control.verified
Load-once fixturing with measured repeatability, not a vice reset between parts.specified
In-process tool monitoring and sister tooling that swaps without intervention.specified
In-process probing and automatic offset correction, so a long run cannot drift out of tolerance unseen.specified
Through-tool coolant, evacuation, and programs written so chips cannot gather where the cutter returns.specified
Our current telemetry adapter reports a machine as running on any successful poll without inspecting the response, so it would read RUNNING through a stopped spindle. Until it is replaced with a real MTConnect implementation and an alarm taxonomy, we have no trustworthy view of an unattended machine.stub
Pallet changer or robot cell: a hardware and integration problem before it is a software one.specified
What happens when something goes wrong at 3am. A cell that cannot decide to stop safely is unsupervised.specified
Order of work
Software first, because it can be proven early.
Rows 02 to 08 need a machine and a cell. Row 01 does not: a program can be proven correct against a stock model, with checks that fail. So that is what exists today, and it is what we ask a buyer to judge.
Proven today
Row 01: every program verified against a stock model before it is posted.
Next with the floor
Rows 02 to 08 arrive with a machine and a cell, each measured against a closed form or a physical standard first.
How a row moves
A row changes from specified to in place on this page when a control that can fail says so, and not before.